tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post1925550415829672642..comments2024-03-20T11:09:50.796+00:00Comments on voiceforchildren: Stuart Syvret Secret Court Case on State Radio.voiceforchildrenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comBlogger180125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-2991363172630397432013-09-24T19:12:53.075+01:002013-09-24T19:12:53.075+01:00TJW.
Hope you got Deputies Trevor, and Shona Pitma...TJW.<br />Hope you got Deputies Trevor, and Shona Pitman's passionate speeches at question time today....<br /><br />Obviously the msm didn't. Not a whisper from them!? <br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-45092803801540869222013-09-24T12:59:33.480+01:002013-09-24T12:59:33.480+01:00Deputy Sean Power STOLE personal data, which cause...Deputy Sean Power STOLE personal data, which caused it to be published, on what many perceive to be, a paedophile protecting hate-site. He did the wrong thing because he didn’t get the data by legitimate means…..He stole it. <br /><br />The said data also identified innocent children who, due to this latest court judgement will now have a strong case, as will Stuart Syvret, to make a complaint to the Data Protection Commissioner for causing them distress. <br /><br />Question is, why has Sean Power not been put through a secret, taxpayer funded, court case and Stuart Syvret has? Do you think Deputy Sean Power should face prosecution for his Data theft and subsequent publication of it? <br />voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-40776083806101684272013-09-24T12:54:46.023+01:002013-09-24T12:54:46.023+01:00Voiceforchildren.
I think it would be ,keeping a...Voiceforchildren. <br /><br />I think it would be ,keeping a record of dates, times & subject matter when the breaks in transmission occurs during States sittings, broadcast by BBC Jersey. <br /><br />The frequency with which this occurs has to be more than accidental. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-19748433160475557942013-09-24T12:39:44.789+01:002013-09-24T12:39:44.789+01:00So trying to get money you are not entitled to fro...So trying to get money you are not entitled to from others to help pay for legal costs deserves to be investigated and exposed ?<br />And that malfeasance should be exposed by whatever means necessary ?<br /><br />voiceforchildren23 September 2013 08:47<br /><br />In a word "yes."<br /><br />Seems, even by your own estimation, that Sean Power did the right thing then in releasing Stuart's E-Mail to the press ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-39913698816292478252013-09-24T08:49:52.012+01:002013-09-24T08:49:52.012+01:00http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/senato...http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/senator-sir-philip-bailhache-man-of_23.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-45379997965049148972013-09-23T22:44:21.251+01:002013-09-23T22:44:21.251+01:00"democracy, which Jersey has great pretension..."democracy, which Jersey has great pretensions to"<br />HAHAHHAHHAAAAAAAA., oh that's funny - and tragic.<br /><br />Jersey is run by the legal profession, and even headed by an unelected chief judge. The Senators/Deputies/Constables bit is just smoke and mirrors to keep the "sheeple" happy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-36127791401564678632013-09-23T12:43:49.885+01:002013-09-23T12:43:49.885+01:00And that malfeasance should be exposed by whatever...And that malfeasance should be exposed by whatever means necessary ?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />voiceforchildren23 September 2013 08:47<br /><br />In a word "yes."<br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-70430882296921060522013-09-23T08:47:28.936+01:002013-09-23T08:47:28.936+01:00In a word "yes." An accounting Officer h...In a word "yes." An accounting Officer has signed off £387,000 which is close to £100,000 more than the Data Protection Office's annual budget. This Accounting Officer needs to justify such a huge expenditure on such a dodgy cause.voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-54049665893131514872013-09-22T23:31:43.155+01:002013-09-22T23:31:43.155+01:00In a democracy, which Jersey has great pretensions...In a democracy, which Jersey has great pretensions to, investigation and transparent exposure are necessary, highly respected cornerstones. You need to become informed about how checks and balances function for the greater good. It is simply not all about you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-4698345507029438092013-09-22T23:00:58.790+01:002013-09-22T23:00:58.790+01:00So trying to get money you are not entitled to fro...So trying to get money you are not entitled to from others to help pay for legal costs deserves to be investigated and exposed ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-29960055186501977682013-09-22T23:00:09.321+01:002013-09-22T23:00:09.321+01:00Better question: Will a Crown Appointee deny democ...Better question: Will a Crown Appointee deny democratically elected representatives the right to ask and learn anything more about it? Honest answer: Without a doubt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-63980125773987417402013-09-22T21:46:29.501+01:002013-09-22T21:46:29.501+01:00Will the logical questions on the implications of ...Will the logical questions on the implications of this secret - but very grave - public interest matter be permitted by the Bailiff?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-9770726878365738492013-09-22T09:12:59.134+01:002013-09-22T09:12:59.134+01:00If we are talking about the possible millions of £...If we are talking about the possible millions of £'s spent on this secret court case then yes I believe whoever the Accounting Officer is who sanctioned the spend should be called to account and justify it.<br /><br />Either PAC (Public Accounts Committee) or Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny Panel (Parliamentary Select Committee) should be launching an investigation. Something tells me that this won't happen.voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-72299944859590509462013-09-21T23:03:45.699+01:002013-09-21T23:03:45.699+01:00Thank you, Anonymous Defender of the Four Wondrous...Thank you, Anonymous Defender of the Four Wondrous Innocents! I, for one, am glad to finally see the complex Crown Court Judgement and Data Protection Case laid out so eloquently and defended so rationally. Finally, we are privy to an example of their best legal minds! ;-p <br /><br />What a shame the Syvret Blog is at all-time reader popularity, especially since the case is closed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-78878400924389685762013-09-21T22:12:00.373+01:002013-09-21T22:12:00.373+01:00If there's such a thing as painfully slow prog...If there's such a thing as painfully slow progress by the painfully slow...that must be it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-7236153068270074492013-09-21T20:55:21.943+01:002013-09-21T20:55:21.943+01:00That is my favourite line of all your comments so ...That is my favourite line of all your comments so far: "getting back to the main posting." I've never seen you get back to a main posting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-76466957705504809052013-09-21T20:53:39.886+01:002013-09-21T20:53:39.886+01:00The key is to find out what data the troll accesse...The key is to find out what data the troll accessed and processed to make the death threat? He has repeatedly claimed to have access, protection, and to be able to find out who and where others are. He uses words like " we are watching," and "we know everything...," so how does he obtain identification and contact data on the family he threatened, where Stuart Syvret was a house guest? Does he have to be sober enough to process this officially private data properly to be prosecuted for his drunken and criminally threatening misuse of it? Would this question( by and to elected representatives) in The States be acceptable enough for the Queen's appointee? Never mind. We can guess the answer. That question would not be permitted and there is no legal method available to find out the answers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-85349875323590020392013-09-21T19:30:18.701+01:002013-09-21T19:30:18.701+01:00''Well if you read into it he has broken t...''Well if you read into it he has broken these peoples Human Rights'' How? The four have human rights to a libel case. That is their right then and now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-84817268914062132872013-09-21T18:56:27.643+01:002013-09-21T18:56:27.643+01:00"Has the Data Protection Law been abused in a..."Has the Data Protection Law been abused in a secret court case? <br />No read the judgement.<br /><br />Are you for real? You read it, so its true?If <br /><br />justice must be SEEN to be done why was this, taxpayer funded, court case in secret? <br />Its not unusual for cases like this, its been said in the States and reported by the media.<br /><br />And politicians and media don't lie. Behave yourself.<br /><br />What ramifications could this very dangerous precedent have for journalism across the board, so-called "accredited" and so-called "non accredited journalists alike?<br />None, this is not about journalism.<br /><br />Oh please now I know your not serious.<br /><br />Is everybody treated equally by the law/Data Protection Office when attempting to make complaints?<br /><br />I would say they are, the Data Protection office said following the Pitmans making a complaint that their complaint was not an issue for data protection law.<br /><br />There you go accepting like a good boy everything told to you. <br /><br />How much did this secret court case really cost the taxpayer?<br />Who cares because the person who was found guilty of breaking the law evidently isn't<br /><br />Now your getting it. Did you figure that all on your own with out help?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-77810860451917438602013-09-21T18:29:55.174+01:002013-09-21T18:29:55.174+01:00So is it your contention that ““Nurse M is going t...So is it your contention that ““Nurse M is going to kill your family” is not a death threat?voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-26863846208798981862013-09-21T18:25:33.467+01:002013-09-21T18:25:33.467+01:00"This was not an isolated incident. a 'on..."This was not an isolated incident. a 'one off' in a moment of madness.<br />The sailed super injunction suggests that 'The death threat caller' rather understated the level of protection by the jersey authorities."<br /><br />You are having a laugh?<br />A member of the public makes a laughing gas phone call after being intimidated on a blog and its that serious.<br />There wasn't even a death threat in it and I think a bounding over for 6 months shows how serious the court took it.<br />Get a recorded message with a sober person and then I may start to understand.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-14597971767008175322013-09-21T18:14:58.058+01:002013-09-21T18:14:58.058+01:00Getting back to the main posting.
"Has the D...Getting back to the main posting.<br /><br />"Has the Data Protection Law been abused in a secret court case? <br />No read the judgement.<br /><br />Why did these four proxies not use libel/defamation laws in order to publicly clear their names? <br />You would have to ask them.<br /><br />If justice must be SEEN to be done why was this, taxpayer funded, court case in secret? <br />Its not unusual for cases like this, its been said in the States and reported by the media.<br /><br />What ramifications could this very dangerous precedent have for journalism across the board, so-called "accredited" and so-called "non accredited journalists alike?<br />None, this is not about journalism.<br /><br />Who brought these very unlikely bedfellows together and what was the motivation?<br />What does it matter and why do you call them bedfellows, isn't that insulting?<br /><br />Is everybody treated equally by the law/Data Protection Office when attempting to make complaints?<br />I would say they are, the Data Protection office said following the Pitmans making a complaint that their complaint was not an issue for data protection law.<br /><br />How much did this secret court case really cost the taxpayer?<br />Who cares because the person who was found guilty of breaking the law evidently isn't.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-79773185676238836962013-09-21T18:11:13.765+01:002013-09-21T18:11:13.765+01:00This bears repeating :
"calling people drunk...This bears repeating :<br /><br />"calling people drunks is not journalism"<br /><br />lol , YES IT IS if their unfortunate drink problem is a factor in making death threats to innocent members of the public.<br /><br />Some of the EVIDENCE is available on the audio recording at:<br /><br />http://therightofreply.blogspot.com/2012/04/another-reminder-of-jerseys-freaks.html<br /><br />It is a threatening phone call where amongst other things he says "Nurse M is going to kill your family" and he effectively boasts of his protection by the police/authorities.<br />Note: BOASTS OF HIS PROTECTION BY THE POLICE/AUTHORITIES <br /><br />Would you think odd IF - note IF :-) - the caller were one of the 4 recipients of £000000's of public funding to bring this failed super injunction ?<br /><br />"Nurse M" is apparently another of the beneficiaries of Emma Martin's generosity with taxpayers money.<br /><br />Do you see the picture if you are able to put the pieces together ?<br /><br />================<br /><br />This was not an isolated incident. a 'one off' in a moment of madness.<br />The sailed super injunction suggests that 'The death threat caller' rather understated the level of protection by the jersey authorities.<br /><br />Fortunately this protection could not erase actual recordings when raised the issue of witness intimidation in court.<br /><br />I wonder if his death threats are now classed as his personal "data" in the catch-all DP law.<br /><br />How many political prisoners will the Jersey Mafia need before they can shut down information and discussion ?<br /><br />Time for some more links I wonder?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-16980962699370870672013-09-21T18:09:14.582+01:002013-09-21T18:09:14.582+01:00Are you forgetting Hillsborough. Wasn't that p...Are you forgetting Hillsborough. Wasn't that proclaimed a conspiracy theory then turned out to be true.<br /><br />It only requires a little intelligence to search out evidence than believe what your told.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-91782885841281444832013-09-21T18:08:02.998+01:002013-09-21T18:08:02.998+01:00“I listened to the recording and its not even a de...“I listened to the recording and its not even a death threat but somebody on laughing gas.”<br /><br />“Nurse M is going to kill your family” is not a death threat?<br /><br />“and these 4 people have won a landmark case for dealing with nuisance blogging.”<br /><br />They wanted the so-called “data” removed, it’s still there, how did they win?<br /><br />They won a landmark victory in shutting down journalism. Admittedly I strongly believe this was not their intention, but they were played like a fiddle by TPTB.<br />voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.com