tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post785406676953918109..comments2024-03-20T11:09:50.796+00:00Comments on voiceforchildren: Contempt of (Unlawful?) Court.voiceforchildrenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comBlogger149125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-85080722751742493102013-12-30T16:54:59.850+00:002013-12-30T16:54:59.850+00:00Firstly I don’t “hate” anybody including the 4 pro...Firstly I don’t “hate” anybody including the 4 proxies. I believe they have all been done up like a kipper in order for the Establishment to get a judge made law to silence any political dissent on the internet.<br /><br />You might see “Syvret” as a convicted criminal but others see him as a Political Prisoner who is a victim of the Island’s corrupt, and politicised, “Justice” system. <br /><br />Perhaps you should try talking to people outside your gang (I’m not part of one). I have spoken with one of the 4 proxies (who I don’t hate) and tried to obtain an interview but to no avail.<br />voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-82393637857910013712013-12-30T15:56:44.923+00:002013-12-30T15:56:44.923+00:00You just hate the proxy 4 and its written all over...You just hate the proxy 4 and its written all over this blog as you just patronise them all the time. Syvret is a convicted criminal, try talking to people ouitside of your gang for a change.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-71316902871746009232013-11-12T22:26:04.054+00:002013-11-12T22:26:04.054+00:00Could some one who uses twitter tweet the above vi...Could some one who uses twitter tweet the above video link to George Galloway please.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-20481367196795810222013-11-12T16:25:36.964+00:002013-11-12T16:25:36.964+00:00These four people took Stuart Syvret to court in o...These four people took Stuart Syvret to court in order to have their names removed from his Blog. As a result of this action their names are on UK Parliament Hansard, and Early Day Motion, Facebook, Twitter, Blog sites and websites and STILL on Stuart Syvret’s Blog.<br /><br />You/They (proxies) are deluding themselves if they/you believe this is any kind of a victory.<br />voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-87325570752054477522013-11-12T10:18:24.246+00:002013-11-12T10:18:24.246+00:00These people have been harassed by Stuart Syvret, ...These people have been harassed by Stuart Syvret, and none have been convicted of the crimes of which he is accusing them. They are innocent in the eyes of the law.<br /><br />These innocent people are sleeping safely in their own beds in the company of their families. Stuart Syvret is sleeping alone in a cell with another conviction under his belt.<br /><br />You are making utter fools of yourselves as trying to spin this as any sort of victory.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-64015276138287464992013-11-12T08:41:11.809+00:002013-11-12T08:41:11.809+00:00I think the point being made is that the Data Prot...I think the point being made is that the Data Protection Office convinced the four proxies by taking the action they did would get the offending articles taken off the Blog and nobody will ever find out about it. The evidence shows the complete opposite to be the truth where even more people know about it/them as a result of the “secret” court case.voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-39755972018195174982013-11-12T08:31:38.720+00:002013-11-12T08:31:38.720+00:00I would have thought that the last thing Stuart wo...I would have thought that the last thing Stuart would want would be for more people to be looking at his blog. The sum of the impact his blog has had since its beginning is for Stuart to have been locked up twice for breaking the law. Any rational person reading it would be able to deduce from it that the man is guilty of everything he has been convicted of. <br /><br />It's simply car crash blogging. Most people are there to gawp at the disaster, rather than analyse the background to the crash. <br /><br />But don't let that put you off.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-2307556640406738552013-11-12T07:53:45.174+00:002013-11-12T07:53:45.174+00:00I was able to capture the screen shot of his blog ...I was able to capture the screen shot of his blog hitting 1,000,000 pageviews a few hours ago, to send to Stuart. Sending him It's also posted on twitter. Sending him to prison certainly didn't keep his blog from being read. If anything, it has brought him many new international readers.<br /><br />ElleAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-59799228422856279482013-11-11T23:26:55.914+00:002013-11-11T23:26:55.914+00:00May be helpful for new readers if contributors c...May be helpful for new readers if contributors could provide quick answer / Evidence to the questions asked by Stuart Syvret in the video above proving or disproving the claims.<br /><br /><br />1. This court is choosing conflicted Judges<br /><br />2. Ignoring there previous judgement in which they said no further action to be taken and a couple of weeks later take further action.<br /><br />3. The secretariat was notified an appeal was being undertaken to be filed still matters of appeal.<br /><br />4. Technically the charge is contempt of court.<br /><br />5. The charge arises from corrupt abuse and suppressive distorted application of the data protection law in Jersey.<br /><br />6. Is this court a lawful court?<br /><br />7. Does it meet the tests of objectivity?<br /><br />8. Does it meet the test of impartiality?<br /><br />9. Is it compliant with Article 6 of the European convention of human rights?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-47638910375688324902013-11-11T23:02:42.234+00:002013-11-11T23:02:42.234+00:00Bailhaches brothers hate what is being written abo...Bailhaches brothers hate what is being written about them on Stuart Syvret's blog. Rather than take him to task, in open court without conflicted friends as judges, they and others have manipulated the data protection law in a underhand effort to discredit and trounce Syvret. What they have actually achieved is to trounce Jersey on the international stage making Jersey look very bad indeed. <br /><br />They have had help from many out of touch politicians drunk on power, and removed mentally from reality. The same politicians who refuse to hold to account, their out of control beach masters, for beach masters, think ministers.<br /><br />They will be talking to you soon, oh yes, as they want your vote, to get back in and serve you more of the same. I wasn't going to mention Barbados, but hell why not.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-73371485209496309612013-11-11T22:57:51.932+00:002013-11-11T22:57:51.932+00:00http://stuartsyvret.blogspot.co.uk/
Total Pagevie...http://stuartsyvret.blogspot.co.uk/<br /><br />Total Pageviews<br /><br /><br />999,870 Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-47446739507528965032013-11-11T21:10:00.047+00:002013-11-11T21:10:00.047+00:00Sorry VFC but this is more wishful thinking than f...Sorry VFC but this is more wishful thinking than fact.<br />You seem to think that Stuart Syvret has a legal right to be in contempt of court and the UK is hardly going to step in and endorse his behaviour of late.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-28165932783410381582013-11-11T20:06:36.904+00:002013-11-11T20:06:36.904+00:00Stuart's imprisonment has gained interest from...Stuart's imprisonment has gained interest from across the world and questions are being asked about the UK's silence. This could prove to be embarrassing/problematic for the UK.voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-91928510201061145732013-11-11T19:50:23.169+00:002013-11-11T19:50:23.169+00:00Just checked Stuart's blog page counter - the ...Just checked Stuart's blog page counter - the numbers since last Monday have rocketed - only around four hundred more and he will reach the big 1 and 6 zeros! Clearly a lot of people are watching.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-89076744537253177752013-11-11T18:09:04.515+00:002013-11-11T18:09:04.515+00:00Was Stuart Syvret ever charged with contempt of co...Was Stuart Syvret ever charged with contempt of court by a centenier personally?<br /><br />Bet not,<br /><br />more flouting of their own laws by the local judiciary.cyrilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12446684471003266089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-89539732339290596672013-11-11T18:04:18.870+00:002013-11-11T18:04:18.870+00:00the whole point of data protection Laws (worldwide...the whole point of data protection Laws (worldwide) is to protect people who give their private information to organisations( social security, banks etc.) it is not to allow the state to prosecute anyone they dislike with pseudo legal bullsh*t masquerading as lawful behaviour. cyrilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12446684471003266089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-25167371466237612052013-11-11T17:09:06.008+00:002013-11-11T17:09:06.008+00:00You do not have to be registered with data protect...You do not have to be registered with data protection to break data protection law.<br />But most journalists who want to be taken seriously will register.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-3551518511264805992013-11-11T17:01:06.135+00:002013-11-11T17:01:06.135+00:00That is your opinion VFC but I would argue it is u...That is your opinion VFC but I would argue it is up to the 4 people involved to decide as to how they want to proceed.<br />I also know that Mr Syvret has had plenty of chances to make political speeches in court cases of the past already, as I have seen him action.<br />Mr Syvret has to date, has had his fair share of speaking his mind to an audience already.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-7120637017151596182013-11-11T17:00:53.059+00:002013-11-11T17:00:53.059+00:00Stuart Syvret was not registered with the data pro...Stuart Syvret was not registered with the data protection office as a data controller, therefor he did not process personal data.<br /><br />Stuart Syvret published allegations about 4 people, the remedy for which is a civil libel suit.<br /><br />The data protection Law has been misused, the legislature did not intend the data protection Law to supersede or take the place of libel suits.<br /><br />cyrilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12446684471003266089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-25331448116457762382013-11-11T16:48:36.449+00:002013-11-11T16:48:36.449+00:00“VFC there is freedom of speech and there is the o...“VFC there is freedom of speech and there is the online harassment of people.”<br /><br />That’s my point there are adequate criminal laws to deal with online harassment. If anything Stuart had posted amounted to harassment then the four proxies could have made a criminal complaint, which would have been dealt with in “open” court.<br /><br />I maintain my opinion that this was a corrupt, and politicised, “secret” court case in order to shut down political dissent and exposure of corruption in Jersey.<br />voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-44597743822280961412013-11-11T16:35:48.721+00:002013-11-11T16:35:48.721+00:00VFC there is freedom of speech and there is the on...VFC there is freedom of speech and there is the online harassment of people.<br />From what I have read I would say I have mainly seen the latter and as the judge said of this material it was 'unnecessary'.<br />He should of just taken it down and lived to fight another day, if he had then he wouldn't be up La Moye.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-60314120186085536172013-11-11T16:31:46.071+00:002013-11-11T16:31:46.071+00:00'' If everything written is TRUE, it makes...'' If everything written is TRUE, it makes no difference. You could expose a paedophile/rapist/murderer but if what you said about him/her causes that person stress, or harm, the Data Protection Office can take you to a secret taxpayer funded court and slam a Super-injunction on you.''<br /><br />If everything written was true then it follows it would cause distress to those named if the public are alerted to it. That is a given.<br /><br />If untrue then the named would feel safe secure and protected.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-975714318588669782013-11-11T16:22:12.003+00:002013-11-11T16:22:12.003+00:00No I am not defending ALL of what is posted on Stu...No I am not defending ALL of what is posted on Stuart’s Blog or calling it all investigative journalism. What I am defending is free speech, public interest disclosure and investigative journalism.<br /><br />With what I, and many others, believe to be a bent and twisted interpretation of the Data Protection Law, so bent and twisted that apparently there is no precedent anywhere in the western world where the DP Law has been interpreted the same way as the Jersey Court has.<br /><br />Because of this judge made law it now looks like you can’t say anything about anybody on the Internet. If everything written is TRUE, it makes no difference. You could expose a paedophile/rapist/murderer but if what you said about him/her causes that person stress, or harm, the Data Protection Office can take you to a secret taxpayer funded court and slam a Super-injunction on you. <br /><br />I maintain my opinion that the Establishment used these four individuals as proxies in order to shut down independent journalism or exposure of corruption on this island. The four proxies have been played like a fiddle…….And the taxpayer has paid for it. <br />voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-73540814888708483812013-11-11T15:58:54.749+00:002013-11-11T15:58:54.749+00:00VFC I have spent some time looking at the material...VFC I have spent some time looking at the material Mr Syvret has defended and are you seriously calling all of it investigative journalism because I can think of other names for it?<br />Actually I am surprised he never took it down to save the hassle.<br />Why didn't you advise him to take it all down?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3591695769525894359.post-28074976562774201142013-11-11T15:54:04.029+00:002013-11-11T15:54:04.029+00:00The action was brought by the Data Protection Offi...The action was brought by the Data Protection Office, on behalf of the proxies. It was a convenient relationship (IMO) The Proxies wanted stuff removed from Stuart's Blog (that's still there) and the Establishment got what it wanted in a <a href="http://youtu.be/KvwJGXGt79I" rel="nofollow">JUDGE MADE LAW.</a> <br /><br />The proxies still think they have got what they wanted and don't seem to understand that the Establishment has got what it wanted and used the proxies to get it. Payed for by the taxpayer and a huge assault on public interest disclosure, investigative journalism and freedom of speech. voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.com