Cheyenne O'Connor
This coming Saturday 16th February at 10am there is a rally to be held at the Royal Square in Jersey. The rally has been organised by online pedophile hunter Cheyenne O'Connor who snares online child predators who attempt to meet (what they believe are) children. Cheyenne poses as a teenage child online and gathers evidence against pedophiles which she then hands over to the police. Her efforts have resulted in a number of convictions with some predators ending up in prison, for what she, and many others believe, a short amount of time.
Cheyenne is advocating for a minimum (three year) prison sentence of pedophiles and believes they should remain on the Sex Offenders Register for life and has created an online petition to that end. The petition has attracted more than 2,500 signatures and received a response from the relative (Home Affairs) Minister. With another 2,500 signatures it will be considered for debate in the Island's Parliament. The petition (and the Minister's response) can be viewed (and signed) HERE. She also runs her own Facebook page where she documents her online work catching pedophiles and cases she is working on. The page can be viewed HERE.
Former Health Minister/Whistleblower Stuart Syvret
VFC spoke with Cheyenne yesterday (video below) and discussed the upcoming rally this Saturday where there will be a few speakers including Survivors and former Health Minister, and whistleblower Stuart Syvret. We also discussed such topics as "The Culture of Fear" so prevalent in our Island, the message being sent out by those attacking those of us who campaign against pedophilia and trying to protect our children. Her response the the Home Affairs Minister's and Attorney General's response, Keyboard Warriors and much more.
We thank Cheyenne O'Connor for the interview and for the work she does in trying to keep our children safe. If you agree with the PETITION and want to make a difference then sign it and be at the rally this Saturday 16th February 10am Royal Square.
I think the Petition is too harsh but it has been answered.
ReplyDeleteIf we stick all sex offenders for life on the Register then who can Police it and the offenders will simply go underground and become even more dangerous.
Cheyenne has gone some way to answered your question below @20:24
DeleteBut you open a very broad subject on the economic, moral, compassionate and above all *effective* treatment of paedophiles and sex offenders in general.
There is not a one size fits all treatment but a common outcome of treatment (including imprisonment etc) is …...failure and reoffending.
If law enforcement has a right to monitor a released offender for life they can still target their resources to those assessed to be the highest risk - many others could be low level monitored by electronic means for virtually no cost.
The reasons for offending varies widely -from a one off "drunken mistake" to career offenders. The most serious tending to exhibit psychopathy or narcissism or for whom their actual unchangeable sexuality is paedophilia.
Sexuality generally cannot b changed and these individuals will remain a danger for their entire life.
Chemical castration is used in the UK and across the world:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/944275/sexual-offender-chemical-castration-ministry-justice-worboys
"...[UK] Justice Minister Phillip Lee asked officials to look at ways of increasing the use of the medical treatment to stop sexual urges because international evidence suggests it is the best way to stop reoffending."
Physical castration is far less common and more controversial:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castration#Preventive_measure
"...In modern times, the Czech Republic practices surgically castrating convicted sex offenders. According to the reports compiled by Council of Europe, a human-rights forum, the central European country physically castrated at least 94 prisoners in the 10 years up to April 2008. The Czech Republic defends this procedure as voluntary and effective.[136] According to Dr. Martin Hollý, director of the Psychiatric Hospital Bohnice in Prague, none of the nearly 100 sex offenders who had been physically castrated had committed further offences.[137] One serial offender stated that being castrated was the "best decision" he ever made: "On the one hand you have to protect the potential victims and on the other hand I wanted to be protected from myself, I wanted to live like a normal person."[138] Don Grubin, a professor at Newcastle University's Institute of Neuroscience who also runs a chemical castration program backed by the U.K.'s Ministry of Justice, was initially opposed to physical castration. After visiting the Czech Republic, however, he agreed that some form of castration might be of benefit to some sex offenders."
Of course punishment and treatment remain for the moment utterly irrelevant in the cases where "priority suspects" were not even prosecuted by Jersey's conflicted judicial system and serious offenders remain in senior and influential island positions or just walking the streets.
Deletehttp://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2015/05/jersey-child-abuse-inquiry-and-william.html
This is part of a statement to the CoI:
Delete"1. I was born on ###### 19## and am Jersey born and bred. My father was
an old Victorian disciplinarian.
2. At the age of 18 I worked for the States of Jersey. In order to assist my
mother who was having financial difficulties, I went for an interview for a job
at a ########################### The interview took place
around 6pm on a winter's evening when I went to the interview in ###########
The man who interviewed me was [737] I didn't know it at the
time but [737] was a ##### I wasn't particularly interested ######
at the time, but I do remember saying that ############# The
interview proceeded normally and towards the end I asked whether he would
consider paying me a lower wage and paying cash in hand: I wanted to help
my mother out of her financial difficulties and this seemed like a good
practical solution. I had no idea that it was not an acceptable thing to say, it
felt like the right thing to do at the time.
3. After I mentioned cash in hand told me that he thought 'we
could come to some sort of arrangement' and proceeded to violently rape
me. I mentioned something about reporting it, but [737] just laughed and
said 'Who would believe your word against that of a ######### .
After hearing that I didn't feel confident to report the incident.
4. I was in a terrible state when I left. My clothes were torn and I was
bloodstained. I walked to my next door neighbour's house as I wasn't
comfortable to go straight home and face my parents. My neighbour's name
was ##### When I knocked on the door her husband answered.
He exclaimed 'Oh my God' and went to get ######.
##### gave me some of clothes to wear so that I could go home.
5. I reported this incident much later on in my life and I will go on to talk more
about this later in my statement. I would be happy for the Inquiry to access
my police statement about this incident.
……."
737 remains employed in a very senior island position.
The above extract is from a transcript of the Fake CoI into Jersey Child Abuse:
www.jerseycareinquiry.org/Transcripts/Day%2081%20Documents%20Optimised%201.pdf
The CoI failed to find any evidence of cover up over the decades of "state sponsored child abuse".
You can no longer access this document - but that is not a cover up either!!!
No, once they come of the sex offenders register after being caught they go underground anyway, at least having them on it for life it means they can’t be monitored legally, the police can police it, they have plenty of time in their hands to go round once a month and check devices etc see what relationships they are and where they work etc. Rather then leaving them go free and innocent women getting into relationships with them not knowing what they are and having them around children, also working with children, vulnerable ones at that. It’s a dangerous game when you let these people go free after a certain period of time.
ReplyDeleteCheyenne
Good work Cheyenne! Much respect.
ReplyDeleteVFC
ReplyDeleteI hope that Team Voice will be there recording the event and the speeches for later publication.
I'm glad Cheyenne has got Stuart on her side this will help her cause no end. He is the original whistleblower in the states who knows how the corrupt system works. Now I know Stuart is going to be at the march I will be turning up also.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work Stuart and Cheyenne.
Great work Cheyenne. You are a brave, hard working and courageous woman. Thank you for protecting children from these predators. Jersey needs more people like you. Your requests of a minimum 3 year prison sentence and life on the sex register is very reasonable but we're in Jersey so there lies your biggest challenge.
ReplyDeleteThis seems a laudable objective. However, is there not a bigger, more fundamental problem in Jersey? This law and other legislation intended to secure and increase effective child protection may look wonderful. But what if it becomes merely 'window dressing'? I think it important for everyone to remember that child abuse, and the enabling and covering up of child abuse, was illegal in Jersey. Both the 1969 Children's Law and the 2002 Children's Law are both very clear. But those pieces of legislation, debated and approved by your legislature, were simply routinely broken, and many of the criminals, both direct child abusers, and those who indirectly abused children by enabling and covering up the abuse, have not yet been prosecuted.
ReplyDeleteI greatly commend Cheyenne and the public spirited work she does. Could I ask if she will consider extending the campaign so as to press for an independent prosecution function in Jersey?
Because at the moment we could have dozens of laudable legislative initiatives, but we have a politicised and structurally broken prosecution system which is permanently conflicted, and frequently refuses to prosecute criminals involved in enabling and concealing child abuse.
Hi this will be one of the things we will also be discussing at the protest. Hope to see you there.
DeleteCheyenne
Think you need a Lawyer to propose an independent function.
ReplyDeleteSomebody with legal qualification and standing who will be recognised by others.
No, that is simply wrong. Obviously so, as it is not compatible with democracy. All kinds of laws and policies become promoted and introduced as a result of grass roots campaigning by the public.
DeleteOnce the public sufficiently motivates elected politicians through campaigns, those politicians then introduce the laws. Jersey needs an actual, functioning independent prosecution system. That much is obvious. The suggestion that this subject should be left to lawyers, and is somehow 'out of bounds' to the public is manifest nonsense.
So long as Attorney Generals/Bailiffs can fabricate evidence - non-existent good supervisionary reports to justify not prosecuting serial offenders, and place Jurats whom the police wanted to prosecute for concealing abuse to sit in judgement on defamation court cases brought by people who have fought to clean up Jersey, to put things bluntly not much is likely to change. It is like Rico Sorda used to say we need to cut off the corrupt snake's head. Good luck with the rally though. I will do my utmost to attend.
ReplyDeleteA very important comment.
DeleteOne from which Jersey has, ultimately, no hiding place.
The man who was your sole prosecution authority, Attorney General William Bailhache, broke all established basics of professional ethics - and persisted in involving himself in decisions concerning the prosecution of child-abusers - basically shielding them and letting them off - when the victims of those child-abusers had already been failed by Bailhache's brother, earlier Attorney General Philip Bailhache (incidentally, the same man who later selected his brother William to become Attorney General) - the same victims who were then betrayed in 1999 by the same family law-firm Bailhache LaBesse / Applbey Global - when the, shortly to be recruited as Jersey Attorney General William Bailhache, was the Senior Partner of Applbey Global.
The plainly evidenced - States of Jersey employed - child-abusers - Jane and Alan Maguire - were eventually tracked down in the south of France in 2008, and should have been extradited then.
Extraordinarily - and this is an example of the corruption of a prosecution function possibly without parallel in all of modern Western democracy - the fatally conflicted William Bailhache - who was by 2008 the Jersey Attorney General - still refusing to declare his terminal conflicts of interest and withdraw - overruled Police wishes to extradite and prosecute the Maguires.
So, yes, in some ways we cannot be surprised that William Bailhache then lied - falsely claiming to have evidence that another child-abuser had received "good supervisory reports" - when no such reports existed.
For these reasons and others, the Jersey mafia has destroyed itself. This is The End we are witness to.
It is very difficult indeed to have any sympathy with the rest of the Jersey establishment - about to lose their racket after over 800 years - because of the abuse-of-power and actions of a few psychopaths.
After all, it isn't as though it was difficult to see that the fate of Jersey had been grasped by a few maniacs - fully self-aware of what they are - but with a defiant après moi le déluge on their lips.
What was the reason given for the states refusing to allow Cheyenne the use of the electrics in the royal square? It looks like they are still trying to hush the growing voice against our corrupt courts.
ReplyDeleteSee comment at 10.45. Bailiffs don't need to give genuine let alone legal reasons to us plebs.
DeleteWhen you think what they did to Stuart, Trevor and Shona the rest of us don't stand much chance, and the bastards know it.
How can a reader talk about 'our growing voice'?
DeleteThings started going awry when Stuart was ousted after the London exile episode.
When Dan Wimberley decided not to re-stand it was another nail in the coffin.
Since the Pitmans were shafted it has been all quiet on the western front bar the occasional democracy death rattle.
Evil has triumped. The devil still sits his throne in court and chamber.
Wake up and smell the brimstone.
Depressing but probably true.
DeleteMost in Jersey don't give a shit unless or until the corruption hits them.
Look at recent history. Hardly anyone cared Jack about Haut de la Garenne or what was done to the brave politicians and police who tried to fight for right.
Fast forward to cutting subsidies for private schools and suddenly the tanks (alright. 4 x 4s) are rolling, the pitch forks and flaming torches being gathered for a march on Rome.
This island sucks.
But the meek shall inherit the earth!
ReplyDeleteIf it's alright with you obviously?
What does the Children's Minister think about all of this? Not heard a peep.
ReplyDeleteLet us hope for a good turn out. Could do with a few credible speakers on the Jersey Way to help attract people. Has anyone else been approached do we know?
ReplyDeleteAt least one Abuse Survivor will be addressing the crowd.
DeleteFair play to him or her. This takes a great deal of courage.
Delete"Could do with a few credible speakers on the Jersey Way" ......Quite so.
DeleteThey already have Ex Health Minister Syvret ......and they don't come much more credible than that.
It would be nice to have the Pitmans, Daniel Wimberly, Higgins, Power, and Advocate Sinel .....to name but a few.
Amongst other contributions of which statements from any victims able to speak should be paramount someone ought to read a resume, a roll call if you like of the caring and brave people who did stand up on the right side and have been bullied, smeared and nigh on destroyed for their efforts. Not all of our leaders are rotten cowards and we should not forget that amidst our anger.
ReplyDeleteIt is with gratification I note that Mr Syvret still terrifies the Jersey mafia and certain of their factotums. The trolling by a certain widely known individual is as predictable as it is comic. So little imagination he can't even invent new lies, and is still repeating the proven falsehood that the absence of My Syvret's evidence from the public inquiry is somehow Mr Syvret's fault. In fact, as has now been stated by a high-calibre legal opinion, the fault lays with the public inquiry in refusing to provided legal representation to the former Health & Social Services Minister.
ReplyDeleteBut, as that point seems to still vex the somewhat limited capacities of comprehension of one or two addled individuals, perhaps Mr Syvret will take the opportunity to address that very subject on Saturday? After all, the witness-tampering involved in the constructive exclusion of the former Health & Social Services Minister, was and is a direct attack on the rights of child abuse victims.
"In fact, as has now been stated by a high-calibre legal opinion, the fault lays with the public inquiry in refusing to provided legal representation to the former Health & Social Services Minister."
DeleteI'm not sure that the COI is blamed entirely for refusing Stuart legal representation.
Quote from the particular paper referred to in the above comment:
"If the States of Jersey truly wanted to draw a line and turn a new leaf, which is what this inquiry sought to do, then legal representation should have been granted to Stuart Syvret. That would have served one of the strongest possible indications yet that the government wants to move forward into an era of transparency and honesty whilst at the same time demonstrating an element of humility, which has been so lacking in the eyes of the victims."
That seems to suggest the States of Jersey had an obligation to provide Stuart with legal representation.
The document can be read HERE.
The Jersey Law Society document is most interesting and a welcome and long overdue development.
DeleteThere are reasons why it minces it's words and ungenerous would brand it as mealy-mouthed. The generous would describe it as clever, brave (under the circumstances) and 'political' - a document of persuasion -sugar coating the bitter pill that must eventually be swallowed to stop the rot before it is too late.
We are encouraged to read between the lines of this 'political' document. In that vein and given the INVERSE(failure) of the CoI to grant the actual Health Minister legal representation (or to subpoena him), VFC's quoted paragraph can be read in the INVERSE:
"the States of Jersey DIDN'T truly intend to draw a line and turn a new leaf, which is what this inquiry pretended to do, and legal representation wasn't granted to Stuart Syvret. That served one of the strongest possible indications yet that the government had declined to move forward into an era of transparency and honesty whilst at the same time demonstrating a lack of humility, which has been so desperately required in the eyes of the victims."
That message was received loud and clear by anyone with the wit to listen. £23m wasted on spin doctoring was never going to change that.
It was unambiguously the legal responsibility of the Committee of Inquiry itself to see that legal representation was made available to people who were key witnesses.
DeleteThere is no hiding place from that fact.
The legal failings - the examples of ultra vires - on the part of your public inquiry are legion, and terminal.
To the extent that people should be prosecuted.
But of course none of that absolves your legislature or your executive of a substantial amount of culpability. For example, it became dramatically apparent at a very early stage that the public inquiry had simply chosen to unlawfully ignore a vital part of its actual legislative instruction, and instead go on a frolic of its own.
No respectable legislature would have tolerated that for one moment. What did we hear from the States of Jersey? deafening silence.
There are so many other examples of startlingly brazen ultra vires - straight forward lawlessness - on the part of the public inquiry - that it itself now embodies the very collapse in proper and safe public administration which underpins all the child abuse cover ups.
This document is a most interesting read, and the authors should be commended. It says it 'like it is' and we should all take note. I doubt that few would disagree with the words of one of the penultimate paragraphs -
ReplyDelete'To finally move away from ‘the Jersey Way’- Jersey needs to show its own islanders
and the world that there is another way- a transparent way, and an empathetic way, a
way that stands up for the weakest and refrains from simply protecting the most
powerful. A thriving democracy needs debate, it needs people willing to stand up and
challenge the system. It needs to listen'
I wish Cheyenne the very best of luck with her protest, and pleased that Stuart has agreed to speak. One thing we should all agree on is that there is nobody more eloquent or aware of the issues than he is. Clearly all is not well even now in regard to the well-being of Children and supplying the appropriate services, and it will also be interesting to see if Senator Mezec will speak to those present and what he has to say on these issues. The battle goes on.
The Inquiry was a shambles. Look at the way Trevor Pitman and Lenny Harper to name but two key witnesses were treated. They just attacked and twisted what Harper had said and in Pitman's case they just seemed scared stiff to get him off so they could say he had appeared. Syvret would have been treated the same.
ReplyDeleteNot to mention Bob Hill.
ReplyDeleteBob Hill had a devastating stroke within days of being abused by the fake CoI
DeleteI suspect that he was traumatised and spent days beating himself up over not having done better to field the CoI's awful questioning.
This is just the sort of stress and anxiety which could trigger a stroke.
A true gentleman and one of the heroes of Jersey child protection and civil rights.
I hope the Commission of Non-Enquiry is proud of itself while they grow fat on their fee.
I hope to see all commenters showing support tomorrow 💪🏼💪🏼 Strength in numbers!!!
ReplyDeleteThank you!
Cheyenne
Too true. However some of those legends mentioned above will obviously not be there through no fault of their own. Bob Hill is still too frail I am told. The Pitmans were disgracefully hounded out of their own home and island and I am told live in France. Lenny Harper obviously will not risk coming back to be stitched up. Not sure where Mr Wimberley is. So Stuart it is down to you alone unless Deputy Higgins Mezec and Tadier show up.
DeleteMezec needs to nail his colours to the mast.
Delete(preferably the right mast)
Mr Wimberley is, as far as I'm aware, currently living on a commune somewhere in the UK. In all honesty, I don't blame him - after what's happened to Lenny Harper, Graham Power, the Pitmans, Stuart, et cetera, everyone knows that challenging the Jersey mafia means a systematic campaign to destroy you. Not everyone is capable of dealing with that sort of sustained harassment.
DeleteI just mean those commenting :) I’m aware that some won’t be able to attend due to our corrupt system, but anyone commenting on here, it would be great to have you all there 😊
ReplyDeleteCheyenne
Cheyenne
ReplyDeleteWith ye in spirit from Dublin.
Pól
Women before they start a relationship could contact the police and ask if the person they wish to date is on or has been on the sex offenders Registrar. No need for life sentences. Even women can abuse children.
ReplyDelete"... is on or has been on the sex offenders Registrar" -not sure that is how the register works -but you are right, it could be put online for the public access you suggest.
Delete"No need for life sentences" -indeed not, that would be inhumane except for the most extreme cases. There are far better and more cost effective treatments available for paedophiles who reoffend.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastration
"Your advocating torture"
ReplyDeleteThat statement is ignorant and untrue.
Surely you mean "You're advocating torture"?
No I am not. Torture is the infliction of pain for non medical purposes.
Elastration is a simple and safe procedure and any pain associated can be prevented with a simple local anaesthetic (as suggested on the wiki page if you had bothered to read and comprehend it)
It is such a simple procedure that no veterinarian involvement is needed and the only medical skill would be for the local anaesthetic if this was required.
Elastration is in use in the transgender and body modification communities.
People who have used this method (without aesthetic!) report that the discomfort dulls after 12 hours. Personally I would recommend the use of an aesthetic.
Elastration is not the only option. Some Urologists recommend the use of the Burdizzo clamp. These devices are widely used and are available for under £15
The economy and effectiveness of treatments is a vital part of this debate.
If you are an expert on these matters (and I suspect you are!), we would be grateful for your suggestions.
Adults have a voice. I am very keen on preventing the torture of children (both physical and psychological) this is where we need to direct the bulk of our resources.