BBC
On Thursday 30th May 2019 BBC State Radio was doing what most of the island's Old Media (formerly known as MSM) do and churning out another Press Release totally unchallenged and without doing the most basic rudimentary checks. The Press Release, according to Chris Stone of BBC Jersey, were signed off by the Jersey Police Authority.
The BBC, on the radio, was repeatedly claiming (because it was in the Press Release) that Jersey has the lowest number of Police Officers per 1,000 population across England, Scotland, Wales and small island Crown Dependencies. I thought "that can't be true we have 13 Police Forces!" (12 Parish Police Forces and the States of Jersey Police Force)
So I did what the presenter of the programme asked and e-mailed in my comment.:
"You are reporting that Jersey has the lowest amount of Police Officers per-head of population in the UK. This seems a little difficult to believe considering we have 13 police forces. Are the Honorary police/Centeniers included in your (States Communications Unit) stats?"
I sent that question/observation in at 07:38, the programme finished at 09:00 and I was told:
"I passed your comment on to James to put to Dr Lane, but other questions got there first."
But here's the thing, there was the best part of an hour and a half to read out my question and it wasn't read out once. On the other hand there was an observation by a listener called "Paul" who said how wonderfully safe Jersey is and how he can leave his keys in his car, front door open etc and that was read out three or four times. How can there not be enough time to read out my (perfectly valid) question (once) but enough time to read out a lovely (show Jersey in a good light) fluffy observation 3 or 4 times? This is one of the questions that I asked Chris Stone that he refused to answer.
Could it be that the State Radio doesn't want its listeners to know the truth about how "over policed" the Island looks when the real stats get put out there? Why didn't The BBC question the Stats in the Press Release/REPORT? Why did such an obvious question have to be asked (but not aired) by a member of the public or New Media (formerly known as Social Media)? What kind of "journalism" is it when a Press Release, with misleading figures, can be churned out and when it is questioned (by a member of the public) the question gets buried?
Former (possibly illegally suspended) Chief of Police Graham Power QPM
Regular readers will know that The BBC has a long history of churning out State propaganda and indeed acting against its own charter in burying a DEFENCE CASE after reporting on the prosecution case of the (possibly illegal) suspension of the former Police Chief. Of course most people will also be aware of the BBC's protection of Britains most prolific paedophile Jimmy Savile and indeed the setting up of a right wing ACTIVIST not to mention the disgraceful treatment of a local left wing opposition POLITICIAN. We have also seen the BBC's claim (as if the links already posted aren't enough) to be "Impartial, Balanced and honest" ripped to shreds HERE. This is without mentioning The alleged Faking SYRIA'S CHILDREN as reported by former ITV and BBC Journalist ANNA BREES.
So after The BBC churning out the Press Release (unchallenged) and duping its listeners into believing that Jersey is "under policed" what is the real story here and just as importantly why doesn't The BBC (or any of the Old Media) want the public to know just how policed we are?
Firstly (and this is something I thought I'd never say) full credit has to go to the Comite des Conetables who supplied me with the figures I asked for. I emailed the Chairman of the Comite at 15:00 (Thursday 13th June 2019) asking for the figures of how many honorary Police Officers there were on the island. I got the reply at 09:05 the very next morning with the figures I wanted. Again, if it's that easy why didn't The BBC (or any of the Old Media) do it?
What The BBC is doing is knowingly broadcasting Fake News. It knows Jersey is a Police State and the stats back this up. It has done nothing (besides bury the truth) in order to inform the public of how many police officers actually police us.
Regurgitated (by Old Media) stats
The real truth is that according to the Comite des Conetables (as of May 1st 2019) there are/were 215 Honorary Police Officers. This includes Centeniers, Vingteniers and Constable’s Officers. So according to The BBC (because it didn't question the Press Release) there are 190 Police Officers on the Island which works out at 1.78 officers per 1,000 people. This, it is claimed in the Report (and The BBC), the least amount of Police Officers per 1,000 people across the UK.
What we don't know is how many Special Constables, and the like, exist across the UK and other Crown Dependencies. What we do know is, with the stats available, that Jersey has approximately FOUR HUNDRED AND FIVE police Officers across the Island and not 190 reported/repeated by The BBC. Without knowing how many Special Constables/other Honorary positions across the UK/Crown Dependencies, far from being the LEAST policed jurisdiction Jersey is in fact the MOST policed......by more than Double the amount reported/repeated by The BBC.
According to the (unchallenged by the Old Media) report Scotland has the MOST Police Officers per 1,000 people with 3.15 and Jersey with the LEAST (1.78). Yet when one asks the most basic of questions "how many Police Officers do we really have" it turns out that we are the most heavily policed jurisdiction in the UK (according to available stats). I'm no mathematician or statistician but rather than 1.78 Police Officers per 1,000 people on the Island the true figure is closer to 3.80. (Beating Scotland's 3.15 considerably)
After The BBC and ITV/CTV didn't have the courage to come and defend their "journalism" at the recent PUBLIC HEARING just this post alone might help explain why. It will also go some way to explaining why, according to the latest SOCIAL SURVEY, 67% of islanders don't trust the local Old Media. MORE stats that have no not been reported on/broadcast by The BBC!
Don't be fooled by Fake News. We are a Police State and The BBC is actively keeping that information (and much more) from you.
Well done.
ReplyDeleteNext question: is this just sloppy or malicious by BBC?
An interesting (and topical!) article on page 4 of your filthy rag this evening. Headed 'Documentary questions number of killings recorded in Second World War Alderney'.
ReplyDeleteIt goes on to reports that 'A documentary will air in the British Isles this evening claiming that number of people killed by the Nazis in Alderney was much higher than official records show.'
Yes, tragically the number is much higher. Why is this terrible historic subject 'topical'? Because the evidenced failures of the authorities in London to deal properly with the aftermath of the Nazi occupation of the Crown Dependency Channel Islands were not qualitatively different from the failures of the authorities in London to deal with Crown Dependency Jersey's child abuse cover ups.
The historic record is very clear about this.
In fact the situation regarding London and Nazi war crimes on Alderney is worse than the documentary suggests. For other reasons. Reasons which will become clear in the fullness of time.
To think, I and colleagues would never have had any curiosity about such subjects and shared reading suggestions and thoughts were it not for the lunatic conduct of your mafia and their London protectors in the 21st century! It was suggested under your previous posting that the Jersey fellows faced losing control of the situation because of their intransigence. Personally I'm feeling that point has passed and events now have a momentum which is unstoppable.
What's new? In the past it has been suggested that in truth around 7.000 inmates were held in smaller version concentration camps. It has also been plausibly suggested that these included a small but significant group of prisioners who were Nazis fallen foul of the regime; men who worse otherwise unknown red badges to highlight their 'crime'. I also can't help but recollect one of your former Jersey politicians who probably rightly once stated to much consternation that the Nazis never really left. They just swapped their jackboots and field-grey for pinstripe suits and brogues.
DeleteA tip off for you.
ReplyDeleteTomorrow morning will see a huge story leading BBC bulletins and subsequent phone-ins being set up.
It revolves around a massive dog turd discovered in St. Brelade.
Even worse, and perhaps the reason for the extra-extra saturation coverage, an elderly gentleman slipped on some leaves in the rain, whilst looking up at a pussycat stuck in a tree, and fell in to it face first.
Fuck Wordl War 3 breaking out unnoticed this is the real story boys and girls!
Fascinating, I've just recently heard similar things to this, 'Because the evidenced failures of the authorities in London to deal properly with the aftermath of the Nazi occupation of the Crown Dependency Channel Islands were not qualitatively different from the failures of the authorities in London to deal with Crown Dependency Jersey's child abuse cover ups.'
ReplyDeleteIn fact my contacts have been more explicit than that comment. It has been credibly explained to me how certain of those Jersey establishment families who profiteered and collaborated with the Nazis, and gained and expanded their family wealth and power during that time, are the same families (their sons & daughters & in some cases grandchildren) who occupied and occupy high public office in Jersey during the island's child abuse cover up scandals and judicial corruption, in which they are active participants.
Everything I've heard is evidenced and stacks up. Now I get why people speak of the Jersey situation as being 'worse than Watergate'. They're not kidding.
Dr Jason Lane
ReplyDeleteChief Executive
Jason started his career as a gaming regulator in 2001 within the Jersey Civil Service. As part of governmental reforms in 2003 gambling became part of the newly formed Economic Development Department and Jason took responsibility for a wider set of regulatory functions as Director of Regulatory Services. Jason left the civil service and became Chief Executive of the independent Jersey Gambling Commission on its inception in 2010. Jason has degrees in Politics, International Studies and a PhD in Policing. He is a former Chairman (2014-16) of the Gaming Regulators European Forum (GREF), an active participant in the IAGR e-gaming working group and a member of the International Masters of Gaming Law. In 2014 Jason was appointed by the Minister for Home Affairs as a founding Board Member of the Jersey Police Authority and became Deputy Chairman in 2015, where he has oversight of business and performance management, workforce management and succession planning within the States of Jersey Police.
You make a valid point VFC and one which any professional journalist worthy of the name would have spotted straight away and run with. Either they really are as clueless as they often appear or they have been beaten into submission. Either way you have exposed yet another example of the general challenge-free uselessness of the paid - so-called-professional media.
ReplyDeleteOT but relevant to child protection and to sections of the media
ReplyDeleteIgnore the ranty bits
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCUjZzuMQq8
The Times of Israel, from October 2017,
ReplyDeletehttps://www.timesofisrael.com/in-nazi-occupied-britain-graves-at-alderneys-little-auschwitz-may-be-defiled/
'LONDON — To the French Jews who toiled and died there it was “le rocher maudit” – the accursed rock. To others, it became known as “Devil’s Island,” “the Buchenwald of the West,” or “Little Auschwitz.”
Alderney is one of the small cluster of islands — an archipelago which includes Jersey, Guernsey, and Sark — which lie in the English Channel off the coast of Normandy. Semi-independent, they were nonetheless the only part of the British Isles to be occupied by the Nazis.
The British mainland may have escaped the horrors of Nazism, but British soil nonetheless witnessed the brutal machinery of death — of slave labor, mass killings, and starvation — which accompanied German rule throughout Europe.
Three miles long and one-and-a-half miles wide, almost all of Alderney’s tiny civilian population was evacuated after the fall of France in June 1940. In their place, the Germans would later ship onto the remote, wind-swept and sea-beaten island a slave labor force of thousands, effectively turning it to one giant concentration camp. Its primary purpose was to fortify Alderney, transforming it into one of the most heavily defended, impregnable outposts of the Reich.
The scale of the horror perpetrated on Alderney is hotly contested. Official accounts after the war suggested that less than 400 of the 3,000 forced laborers — and among them, only a handful of Jews — died on the island. Seventy years on, though, historians and military experts suggest the workforce and the death-toll may have been many times higher — with perhaps as many as 40,000 people losing their lives. Moreover, the number of Jews on Alderney may not have been in the hundreds but instead close to 10,000, few of whom survived the deadly experience.......'
The article continues and is essential reading for the survivors of Jersey's child-abuse cover-up catastrophe.
Discovering at last the Nazi war crime and consequent British establishment cover up concerning the British Channel Islands is to be encouraged and greatly commended, I can say with confidence your realisation of the fact that British establishment tax haven Jersey has been and still is a global transnational big money mafia hub with no credible law enforcement system is catching more ears.
ReplyDeleteThe famous anti mafia writer and activist Roberto Saviano was cited under a previous post. His essential words were quoted,
'“The UK is the most corrupt country on earth, using Gibraltar, Jersey and other territories to funnel dirty cash ”'
The concealment by London of Nazi genocide on the Crown Dependencies is terrible. But so is the hosting of global mafia activity on the same Crown Dependencies with the same London complicity.
Perhaps you should seek out Saviano and explain to him just how truly terrible, worse than he even suggested, Jersey and its mafia are?
Apart from what happened on Alderney I have for many years had very serious doubts about the 'real' intended use of the so called 'underground hospital' here in Jersey (now called Jersey War Tunnels)
DeleteWHY? has this structure got gas tight doors at both the main entrance and the entrance in the valley beyond, the Nazi regime were adept at building liquidation establishments in the occupied countries so what were their intentions for the UK in the event of a successful invasion?
Gas tight doors for a storage (read hospital) tunnel.
Answers on a PC
To return to the main point of the article. It looks as if the considered view of the Jersey Police Authority is that the Honorary Police do not count in an assessment of police resources. That will not go down well in the Parish Halls. Try taking that line in an election and see how many votes it gets. What is demonstrated is the crass insensitivity of the original press release. Over the years hopes have been expressed that the Authority would help to modernise and integrate the policing resources in the island. At least you have challenged them on the issue even if the BBC missed the story staring them in the face.
ReplyDeleteShould we be paying the BBC Licence Fee?
ReplyDeleteDid anybody watch the Con. Len Norman attack on Deputy Mike Higgins on Tuesday?
ReplyDeleteCan we have a link?
Hope to be publishing a Blog about it after the weekend.
DeleteDep Higgins should have put this Long Past His Sell-by Date excuse for a politician in his place with a Pitman-style salvo straight from the hip. Mike Higgins is just about the only worthwhile politician that we have left. Disgraceful bejhaviour from a Home Affiars minister as equally useless as Kristina Moore.
DeleteLen Norman is the old paedo protecting guard.
DeleteHiggins must be sick of life as Jersey's only politician with any regularly on show guts. Montfort Tadier did well to back him up on this occassion. But the incident only shows how rarely the other progressives in our States rouse themselves and pop their little heads over the parapet. Doubt Mike Higgins will stand again. These pretend democrats must make him sick. They certainly make me want to puke. Reform? Now that name has become a joke.
DeleteAt 71 I accept that I am likely one of your older regular readers but I still work, being fortunate enough to have my own small family business. I am certainly not rich but in a place as expensive as Jersey even a, dare I say it, very well run and busy little business often struggles to deliver the standard of living I once expected. But I digress. As with your reader above I find myself more depressed than ever in regard to our political situation. I am obviously not old enough to remember the aftermath of the Occupation. But I begin to feel that it must have been more vibrant even then. For attending what I thought was a roadshow setting out reasonable reforms in the country parish next to me (I probably am wise not to name it for fear of upsetting the odd customer) I really felt like I was back in the 1960s at least. What is it about democracy that some my age and far younger just don't seem to get? You would have thought that everything being proposed was of the level of burning the Union Jack or hanging our dear Constables from the village green lamp post. As to my ultimate point. I genuinely believe that reform of our governmental system needs to be taken out of the States' hands. That there also seems to be not a single member willing or capable to scream about this from the rooftops while throwing down the rooftiles of oppression as he or she does so is possibly even more disappointing. My island is I am sorry to say an embarrassment to the 21st century.
DeleteAgree with you. The sickeneing thing for me is not just that our government are obviously incapable of pushing through democratic change for the betterment of the majority, they evidently don't even want matters to improve. Keeping the old bous network alive and kicking is all that matters. Unfortunately you have to wonder if even Reform Jersey have quietly been absorbed.
DeleteLook forward to this VFC. I think perhaps that Norman took a step to far.
ReplyDeleteI must say the people responsible for running your child abuse public inquiry are really screwed. Discussing this with colleagues today after some weekend background reading. Dear oh dear what fraud! Thing that has us shaking our heads is how they made literally no attempt to disguise the fundamental lawlessness, e.g ignoring legislative instructions, simply failing to investigate many of the serious matters, using conflicted lawyers, witness intimidation, multiple breaches of the ECHR, constructively excluding the key witness whistle blower, failing to secure unarguably vital testimony, choosing to ensure there was no professional legal representation permanently present on behalf of abuse victims, prima facie misappropriation of public money, etc. But there was no attempt to hide all this! It's there in plain sight! Remarkable. It's as though the team producing the show, and that's a good word for it, show, were following the instructions and directions of a psychopath. The immense risk taking involved in this path, the recklessness, the seaming total failure to exhibit any foresight of inevitable consequences for ill judged and irrational actions, the lack of ethics, the very apparent sense of invulnerability, etc. Our view when discussing the Jersey situation is that somewhere behind the conduct of Jersey's mock public inquiry we will find the hand of one or more certifiable psychopaths.
ReplyDeleteAs another London lawyer who keeps a weather-eye on the spiralling Jersey Situation from time to time I have to agree. What you need to be doing is demanding the United Kingdom intervene immediately before it gets any more embarrassing.
DeleteThis is precisely what Stuart Syvret has said. He has been treated even worse than a dissident in Putin's Russia for his efforts.
DeleteAnonymous @15:01
DeleteThat is a good summary of most of what was wrong with the Inquiry.
We could add Ian Le Marquand illegally keeping Graham Power on ice - ignored by the inquiry
Lack of follow up on Person 737 and clumsy attempts to protect his identity which only succeeded in definitively revealing it.
Sending highly sensitive material in the ordinary post where it may well have been accessed by unauthorised persons.
Not facing up to why Lenny Harper did not return to the island in person for the Inquiry.
The coming and going of evidence on a website that was unreliable and frequently went off air. All this without the least comment, never mind apology, from the Inquiry.
and so on.
'As another London lawyer'
ReplyDeleteYeah, Jersey must be quivering in it's boots from all these legal threats coming in anonymously.
My dear fellow, I haven't made any legal threats. I'm not one of the claimants. All I do here is offer the obvious basic legal assessments drawn on publicly known facts re events on Jersey. I'm not alone either in having a professional curiosity in respect of the Jersey situation (and London's central role) because of the unprecedented (for Britain) legal and constitutional questions on the table. The opinion was expressed under the previous posting that the situation was 'worse-than-Watergate'. That may very well be so, but I think a more useful tool for thinking about where Jersey stands is the 'black-swan' analogy. These events are unprecedented in British jurisprudence, and no-one can know how or when things will resolve, as resolve they must. So don't be surprised a number of us are watching, at least 2 of my junior colleagues are planning PhDs on all this!
DeleteThe beginning of the end for the JEP
ReplyDeleteFascinating that the Guiton Group are being 'sold' to another set of place-holder 'owners'.
DeleteLet us hope the purchasers & their agents are exercising due diligence?
If so, they will have taken steps to appraise themselves of all risks and liabilities which come along with the purchase.
Let us face facts, a number of entire sections of Jersey's community undoubtedly have dramatic class-action criminal and civil legal causes-of-action against The Guiton Group.
It can't be imagined that the totality of criminal and civil legal liabilities of The Guiton Group towards civil society on Jersey are anything less than £1 billion. At least.
As another reader observed under your previous posting, 'I don't know if you or Jersey's many survivors, whistle-blowers and other victims of crime are conscious of this fact which is rather obvious to those of us who view events on Jersey through a legal prism, but is it commonly recognised that a number of serious prima facie criminal charges are apparent against Jersey's established media? Certainly the 'effective economic owners' (whoever they may be!) of the JEP's parent company The Guiton Group would be subject to detailed criminal investigation if these events had unfolded on the mainland.
I won't spell out 'why', because that could cause you difficulties, but I'm sure you and your regular readers will understand the salient facts without having to tax your imaginations.'
The above facts are very well known and understood by various interested parties.
Let us hope for the purchaser's sake they employing competent, and non-conflicted', legal advice?
It is said, 'It can't be imagined that the totality of criminal and civil legal liabilities of The Guiton Group towards civil society on Jersey are anything less than £1 billion. At least.'
DeleteI think it readily ascertainable that that has to be a significant underestimate.
After one takes into account the obvious direct legal liabilities accrued to the various separate identifiable cohorts of victims of malfeasance by the tortfeasor (the effective economic owners of The Guiton Group) one then has to address the many and obvious harms, liabilities, and ultimate economic losses and losses of opportunity caused to the community of Jersey as a whole by the unlawful acts and omissions of The Guiton Group. That latter sum is unknowable at this point in time, but if one makes the entirely reasonable assessment that the conduct of The Guiton Group is foreseeably instrumental in bringing about the termination of Jersey as a credible jurisdiction and the termination of Jersey as an off-shore finance jurisdiction, then the financial liability owed to 110,000 people of Jersey and their descendants will be to all intents and purposes, unlimited.
The resultant financial liability caused by The Guiton Group's demonstrable role in undermining the rule of law on Jersey and undermining democracy on Jersey and so assaulting the welfare of an entire community, obviously runs into many billions of pounds. Clearly, a community with the enjoyment of as much financial flow-through & generation of capital as Jersey has seen ought reasonably have reserves akin to the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. That Jersey does not have this security, and that if it's present and future economic prospects become annihilated, the evidence for core culpability for that outcome lays upon The Guiton Group, its owners and beneficiaries.
That much is plain fact.
Who would buy a local newspaper faced with sales figures which have halved in a few short years, is now wafer thin yet charges people twice the purchase price of only five or six years ago? It is probably only old folk looking to see who has been born, died or got hitched that keeps it half-a-float. It has zero credibility now too. I ask again why would anyone want to buy that? Paying the price for all the lies it has peddalled and all the lives destroyed by its toadying to the Bailiff Gang. Good rid.
DeleteThe Jersey Government and its Gangster element are going down, the Guiton Group are going down, the Care Inquiry Panel are going down and all the criminals who ever doubted us are going down.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget the BBC, the Data Protection office, the Law Offices and all them toxic Lawyers.
DeleteThis comment under the last posting made me laugh so bad I blew cappuccino out of my nose over my Mac Book Pro. 'We laughed, my colleague and I, she saying to me, 'just imagine, if one of these 'jurats' was, say, married to a serial rapist?' 'Yes', I laughed, 'that would crush at a stroke the credibility of the judicial system on the Crown Dependency! Well, thank God nothing that crazy can happen eh?''
ReplyDeleteYes that was really funny but I was struck by the sudden thought that 'what if the London crooks who support our mob didn't know because they've never been told the awful truth about our main gangsters?' There's corruption and then there's 'Corruption'. A few high-up lawyers and civil servants in London might have helped our crooks thinking that what they were getting involved in was just a standard bit of financial corruption. Maybe they never realized what kind of deep scum they were tying themselves to?
DeleteThis was always, as was known from 2007, a mass-scale child-abuse cover-up. Come on, they knew. These people enthusiastically jumped-in with both feet into the massively lucrative swamp of the high-level child-abuse-concealment industry.
DeleteStuart Syvret
Investigative journalist, historian, international anti-mafia activist.
Jurats married to a serial rapist? Mmmm, well given you poor souls over there have seen no problem with having a Jurat that even the disgraced Jersey Old Bill wanted to prosecute for bullying abused school boys in to silence I suppose anything is possible.
DeleteCome on be fair. You can't expect to just rely on any old Joe to ensure the required outcome of a court case. Our Lords and Masters need to know the outcome of any otherwise tricky court proceddings is guaranteed before they start don't they? How else are you meant to bankrupt, remove or otherwise silence any troublesome politicians? Not to forget sending out the right message of keep your heads down to any others possibly thinking of getting a bit shirty with the Bailiff. Syvret told you all about this years ago.
DeleteWhat happened to the Len Norman post?
ReplyDeleteChrist your censorship of comments is worse than Facebook.
ReplyDeleteMy guess would be to suggest that maybe, just maybe, if you only sent through one or two per day than sending a couple of dozen, no doubt all attacking/attempting to rubbish the champions judicial abuse the moderator might let them through. Just saying.
DeleteWonder what triggers Mr Moany's frenzies? My shot would be that it is any comment including mention of the Bailiff, the Royal Court or Jurats. You have to chuckle really 14.32.
DeleteYou said after the weekend you were doing a post on Len Norman.
DeleteWell?
Just imagine the tailspin the poor sock gets in to when somebody mentions certain ex-police officers or politicians!
DeleteIn your case, Voice, I would take the above comment (@ 08:48) as a compliment to your sensitive moderation.
ReplyDeleteIf anything you have been a little on the tolerant side of late.
There is no moderation on the JEP website.
Delete@Anonymous 10:57
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha, wah ha ha ha ha ha, ho ho ho
Oh, I like a good laugh every now and again, thank you.
The Beano is not the Rag
10.57. There is also no one who isn't a troll on the JEP website most likely. Certainly all the off-topic attacking of anyone Progressive is done by a very sticky sock. To be fair hardly anyone reads the JEP per se either outside of the morbidly curious and lawyers monitoring it for clients while this site is always very busy when a new story appears. I imagine that arises out of respect for quality journalism?
DeleteI believe your correspondent at 08:48 is about to discover the inevitable limitations of ego-crazed 'chisers' who get into over-reach. There's some conduct so disgusting that not even bent cops, Freemasons and gangsters can shield you from the consequences thereof. A clear warning, from the Jersey establishment he worships notably, was issued to him when he was openly named and condemned as an obnoxious troll by your Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, on the basis of false & vexatious complaints against modern, ethical members of your legislature.
ReplyDeleteThat alone is grounds for people affected by his conduct, Stuart Syvret for example, to seek the troll's public exposure, along with those he has worked for, and those who have protected him, Jersey's conflicted Attorney Generals, for example.
As it's frankly clear to both sides that The Troll is a massive liability, it may very well be that firstly throwing this gutter pig to the wolves could be the action which heralds, finally, some kind of dialogue between the two Jersey factions; dialogue which can never begin whilst manifest foul turds remain protected by what is supposed to be a law-enforcement-system on Jersey.
It wasn't him. He's dead.
DeleteA reader makes a broadly correct assessment, in which they say this, 'That alone is grounds for people affected by his conduct, Stuart Syvret for example, to seek the troll's public exposure, along with those he has worked for, and those who have protected him, Jersey's conflicted Attorney Generals, for example.'
DeleteBut how is it proposed that the many victims of the known troll should seek the troll's exposure? As the reader themselves points out, the co-conspirators with the troll include Jersey's Attorney Generals.
The reader names Stuart Syvret as a victim of the troll and Attorney Generals, but as those self-same Attorney Generals inevitably 'progress' in the Jersey brotherhood into being the judges, where is the objective and non-conflicted rule-of-law to which Syvret could take his case?
Plain fact is that Jersey possesses no such impartial judicial system.
No, you're not dead. Many civilized people, in Jersey, around the world, know exactly who you are. And we're making especially sure that the rule-of-law is brought to bear on you. No matter how long that takes. How long do you think civil-society is going to require for your sentence, for crimes such as perjury? Massively evidenced perjury, perjury against child-abuse whistle blowers? And that's only the perjury, troll, let's also bring into the equation the conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
DeleteYou're going down, troll.
Fatal mistakes, over-estimating your usefulness, and the power of your protectors, and being a twat.
I don't what anybody else thinks but VFC should be having a word with itself over the level of childish comments on it's Blog of late. "You're going down Troll" is as silly as it gets.
DeleteTime for a new Post and a fresh direction.
Anonymous @ 07:58
DeleteI agree that there has been a lot of annoying bluster in the comments of late. However I tell myself that Voice, as one of the few remaining independent outlets on the island, is probably right in giving us a flavour of what's out there - without, of course, indulging the troll.
My earlier post on Jon.
Link
Anonymous 29 June 2019 at 07:58 is spot on, this post is mean't to be about the BBC fake news reel and not squabbles. Some of these comments have nothing to do with the BBC.
DeletePS: just thought I'd let readers know that, following my link above, the troll has been back reading my blog and flinging more insults around the place. No rest for the wicked.
ReplyDeleteWhat happened to Dep Higgins V Cun Norman post?
ReplyDeleteApologies for delay on that posting. The problem/dilemma I have is because of the police/Law Offices Departments actions/in-actions I am aware of at least one alleged Survivor who will now NOT come forward. If Survivors then see/hear Len Norman's and others actions/in-actions in the States Assembly will this prevent further Survivors from coming forward?
DeleteThat all said, is trying to encourage survivors to come forward just giving them false hope due to the possibility of a corrupt and politicized police force? (We know the Law offices are politicised and corrupt.
Will keep giving it some more thought and will have made a decision by tomorrow.
You should publish the story because it's news and it happened.
Delete@17:07 The JEPeado and BBC/Savile Broadcasting Co. tell "stories" whereas Team Voice generally publish information and reports. I doubt that many genuine readers would claim a better grasp of the "big picture" than VFC or (credibly) doubt his knowledge or judgement.
DeleteI am sure we are all eager to see VFC's next post or revelation but as this event is nearly a week old now it is hardly time sensitive and will be equally valuable if published at any time before the next election. Perhaps MORE valuable as "timing is everything" ......or can be :-)
Well glad I spent all day at the Beach if this the the standard of debate today.
ReplyDeleteNew Post Voice and quick.
The "standard of debate today" has been just fine (except for the troll comments LOL).
DeleteDid anyone see you at the beach today? or were you in your room all day slinging vacuous comments at VFC ….and maybe Póló too?
A good day if you got 5 published by VFC.
How many comments today were unfit for publication, VFC?
There were 17 comments deemed not fit for publication yesterday and 4 so far today. In total this posting has received 68 comments not deemed suitable for publication and 62 (now 63) that have been published.
DeleteNew Blog Posting going up today (Len Norman and others) and in keeping with the topic of this posting the BBC did NOT report on the exchange between Deputy Higgins and Len Norman.
Len Norman (with others) and "THE JERSEY WAY."
ReplyDelete