Monday 9 November 2020

Reform Jersey Support Vote of No Confidence.




The leader of Jersey's only political party (Reform Jersey) Senator Sam Mezec has resigned his positions as Minister for Children and for Housing in the lead up to the vote of no confidence against Chief Minister Senator John Le Fondre which is due to be debated in the island's parliament tomorrow (Tues 10th November 2020)

Fellow party member, Deputy Montfort Tadier, has also resigned his position as Assistant Minister for Economic Development.

Reform Jersey, which has five elected States Members, will all be supporting the Vote of No Confidence against the Chief Minister. Those five votes could prove to be pivotal.

Below is the Press Release published by Reform Jersey and below that is the resignation letter, sent to Chief Minister John Le Fondre, by Senator Sam Mezec.

Press Release – Embargoed until 6am on Monday 9th November 

Reform Jersey to support ‘Vote of No Confidence’ in the Chief Minister


Following recent events surrounding the Chief Executive Officer of the Government of Jersey taking on a non-executive directorship for a UK-based real estate company, and the failure of the Chief Minister to show adequate leadership, Reform Jersey’s elected States Members will be supporting the Vote of No Confidence on Tuesday.

Senator Sam Mézec and Deputy Montfort Tadier have formally resigned their roles as Minister for Children and Housing, and Assistant Minister for Economic Development, respectively.

Party Leader Senator Sam Mézec said “Reform Jersey members have played a constructive role since the last election, both in and out of government, to implement our manifesto pledges, and we are proud of our record. We have spoken out in recent months about our concerns that the government has been failing on its commitment to ‘Reduce Income Inequality’ and that there is an undemocratic culture in parts of the civil service which sees elected members obstructed when trying to carry out their policies.”

“Last week, I, alongside other ministers, made clear our view that the CEO should not also hold a non-executive directorship with a private sector company. A week has gone by, and this decision has been treated with contempt. If the Council of Ministers was in charge of the island, this decision would have been implemented by now, but it has not. The Chief Minister exercised poor judgement in allowing this in the first place, and by allowing the States Employment Board to give retrospective permission for this appointment, he has tied our hands and left us in an untenable position.

Deputy Montfort Tadier said “We do not take this decision lightly, but it has come to the point where we can no longer support this Chief Minister with a clear conscience. He has been weak or absent on key policies such as the landlords register, electoral reform, and reducing income inequality. This latest development is the final straw.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Resignation letter of Senator Sam Mezec.


Senator Sam Mézec

States Assembly Morier House St Helier
JE1 1DD

8th November 2020

Dear Chief Minister,

I write to you with regret, in accordance with Article 22 of the States of Jersey Law 2005, to resign my position as Minister for Children and Housing.

I confirm that I have the support of my Reform Jersey colleagues in doing this, and that it is our intention to support the Vote of No Confidence motion being debated by the Assembly on Tuesday.

As you know, I have felt for some time that our government has fallen short on the commitments we made in the Common Strategic Policy to Reduce Income Inequality. After two years of nominally including this in our work programme, I believe there is no evidence at all that this has been achieved. Where I have pushed for our policies to go further to achieve this aim, I have met constant resistance both politically and administratively.

Reforming our social housing rents policy was a cornerstone of the manifesto I was elected by the public on, but I have felt obstructed by officers who I ought to be able to rely on to implement my policy decisions. I have received more support from bodies outside of government than inside and have constantly had to manoeuvre through the civil service to have my policy positions accepted. When fighting for an Andium Homes rent freeze over the last few months, I discovered officers had pursued a funding arrangement for this which I had explicitly ruled out. This should not be the case in a democracy.

I was extremely disappointed earlier this year when the Environment Minister was let down by yourself and other government colleagues in the States Assembly when, after a year of hard work, he brought forward regulations to introduce a landlord licencing scheme to improve housing standards for renters and to protect their health and safety. Before the debate, your support was sought, and you declined to tell us that you would not support us, leaving us to discover this during the debate itself. Because of this, I can have no confidence that I will not be treated the same way if I attempt to see through my ambitions to establish rent stabilisation measures, which are evidenced throughout Europe to improve affordability of private rental housing, but which will inevitably concern investors. A government should always be on the side of the people, not investors.

On top of this, a refusal to back moves to increase the Minimum Wage and achieve progressive tax reform (amongst other missed opportunities) shows that the governments commitment to Reduce Income Inequality’ is in tatters.

But now the Assembly is asked to decide whether we have confidence in you as Chief Minister, after recent events surrounding the Chief Executive Officer taking on a non-executive directorship for a UK company.

Last weekend, the government made clear our view that the CEO should not hold a private sector NED for a UK company. We are now a week later, and there are no signs that this view will be respected. Statements which have been published have said nothing of value and have clearly angered the public.

I believe that the fault for this lies with you. You exercised bad judgement in verbally approving the request from the CEO to take on another role (in contrast with the Deputy Chief Ministers position on this) and then in allowing the SEB to provide retrospective permission, before properly consulting with the government. This is a mistake which could cost the public.

I find myself asking the question who runs Jersey, the elected government or the civil service?” That question should not even be fathomable in a democratic society.

I am deeply disappointed that I have to relinquish my role as minister in order to make this stand, but my conscience will not allow me to do otherwise. To not do so would be to act as if nothing is wrong.

I am proud of all that I have achieved as Minister for Children and Housing. I believe I have exceeded the expectations of those who believed I was not capable of working outside of political opposition, and I believe both of my portfolios are in a substantially better position than when I inherited them. The team I have worked most closely with (in CYPES, IHE , SPPP and the MSU) have been outstanding public servants who have given their hearts and souls to Putting Children First’ and I know they will continue to do so. I am also grateful for the support Andium has given me, and I regret how badly they are often let down by undemocratic government processes.

Where some may have lost faith in me, believing I had gone to the other side” or watered down my principles in order to hold office, I hope that my actions will show that, for me, the public of Jersey always have and always will come first.

9 comments:

  1. Deputy Inna Gardiner was just on State Radio supporting the Vote of No Confidence against Chief Minister John Le Fondre.

    She spoke of "a government within a government."

    Shall we see if ANY of our esteemed "journalists" are going to report that we were warned about "a government within a government" by the (possibly illegally) suspended Chief of Police Graham Power QPM back in 2010.

    Quote Graham Power"

    "It may be that I have provided sufficient information to enable the Committee to consider a way forward on this issue. However, in the hope that it may be helpful, I will offer some personal thoughts and additional information which may assist.
    On a straight reading of the available evidence it may occur to many people that the most likely probability is that the former Minister for Home Affairs knowingly provided an account which is distant from the truth. That may be the case, but there are other possibilities. One is that he was not the main author of the process. The known facts allow for an alternative explanation. That is, that the decision to suspend was in fact taken by others for motives of their own, and that the then Minister was brought in at the final stages to provide his signature, and thereby appear to legitimise a process which was conceived by others. Such an interpretation would of course raise the possibility of a “Government within a Government” in which unidentified and unaccountable individuals exercise power outside the parameters of the law. If that was the case then the constitutional implications would be significant. This would be particularly true in the context of a potential impact on the independence of a part of the Criminal Justice System.

    Read it all HERE.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The rot has been festering for decades as shown by Graham Power but getting rid of the Chief Minister isn't the answer. Hats off to Sam and Monty for showing some backbone but this will do nothing to rid the island of its deep rooted rot.

      Delete
    2. As true now as it was back then. I have been following this saga via the Bailiwick Express with growing jaw-dropping amazement and also admiration for the quality of the investigative skills shown by the Express team. It was they who had earlier forced the disclosure of the employment terms of the Chief Executive, they who spotted the need for him to have written authority from the States Employment Board for a second job, and they who posed the killer question when they asked to see a copy of that authority.

      This brought into the open the fact that none of the key players had acted according to the rules. The same rules which those in power had approved on the customary assumption that they would apply to others but not themselves. It beggars belief that when this mad idea was first proposed nobody involved appears to have consulted the actual rules or foresaw the public and political reaction. This is symptomatic of an inner circle characterised by arrogance and a disregard for the rules which they apply to the rest of the population.

      It is a good job that they are also careless and stupid. Otherwise they would never get found out.

      Delete
  2. Well done Reform Jersey. Some honest and principled politicians still exists

    ReplyDelete
  3. Short trailer of in-depth interview with former Children's and Housing Minister Senator Sam Mezec.

    Hope to publish full interview later today.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So where are his worries and concerns for taking on the role for protecting the children if the proposition is successful and he doesn't get voted back in as Children's Minister or was it just a badge to pin on his lapel, I am, "yes a Minister".

    Talk about chucking the baby out with the bath water but on this occasion the baby has chucked himself out.

    Apparently due to the pandemic, the story of "judas" has been cancelled at both the Opera House and the Art centre or is it true that John Le fondre is still trying to pull Sam's knife's out of his back.

    anonymous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think both Sam, and Monty, have done the right thing by resigning their positions. They might have had some small successes as Minister/Assistant Minister but they are far more effective in opposition.

      Stay tuned for the interview with Sam later today..................

      Delete
    2. Couldn't agree with you more VFC. I have my disagreements with Sam in the past, but on this occasion am fully behind him, Monty and Reform at this time. The Island needs no more lily-livered politicians and will have more respect for those who will stand up and be counted.

      Delete
  5. Full interview with Senator Sam Mezec now published HERE.

    ReplyDelete